The concept of no single great explanation for consciousness

An alternative is to organize philosophical stances according to basic issues. However, if our next theory is correct, we can throw such an experiment right out the window.


For if some of the concepts in C are purely recognitional ones, then they will not be broadly functional ones. Of course there have been other arguments by other authors for an explanatory gap, as already noted above. For another example of the same general type, consider evolutionary biology.

Another theory is semantic pointers, which use perceptual and motor representations and these representations are like symbols. I think rather that the single consciousness was extremely primitive and limited at the very beginning.

Lovelace was essentially dismissive of the idea that a machine such as the Analytical Engine could think in a humanlike way. These experiences, considered independently of any impact on behavior, are called qualia.

However, it remains unspecified which kinds of information are integrated in a conscious manner and which kinds can be integrated without consciousness. The name is relevant only in so far as it resonates with you. See Carruthers for detailed discussion, and also for development and defense of a novel form of dispositionalist higher-order thought theory, comparing it with alternatives.

What other problems do you have in mind? It is desirable to guard against the possibility of exaggerated ideas that might arise as to the powers of the Analytical Engine. The real explanatory work would still remain to be done. Studies found that when measuring the qualitative features during partial epileptic seizures, patients exhibited an increase in arousal and became absorbed in the experience of the seizure, followed by difficulty in focusing and shifting attention.

However, this test can be used only to detect, but not refute the existence of consciousness. Which descriptions from a given level are the relevant ones, though? Thus, any examination of the evolution of consciousness is faced with great difficulties. There are just too many of them infinitely manyfor one thing.

Our aim is to say something true and substantive about the world, not to construct a conditional whose truth we can see a priori.

This measure was shown to be higher in individuals that are awake, in REM sleep or in a locked-in state than in those who are in deep sleep or in a vegetative state, [98] making it potentially useful as a quantitative assessment of consciousness states.

Tononi believes that it is this linking of information that is the basis for consciousness. In this case, the English speaker is acting as a computer and the rulebook as a program.

While I am sympathetic to this claim see also Laurence and Margolis, forthcomingin what follows I propose to grant the truth of the first premise. Research in this area has not yet reached firm conclusions, but a recent questionnaire-based study identified eleven significant factors contributing to drug-induced states of consciousness:Therefore we all are part of that one conscious energy and hence we all are one consciousness!

Affectionately. could not understand the concept". No one can. Consciousness is not a concept that it can be understood. To 'understand' is to (apparently) stand beneath the object that is understood. This is 'The Single Eye of God'. Notice. Probably for as long as humans have been able to grasp the concept of consciousness, they have sought to understand the phenomenon.

Studying the mind was once the province of. There is a single, intelligent Consciousness that pervades the entire Universe - all knowing, all powerful, all creative and always present.

Implications of a single consciousness

Your mind is part of the one Universal Mind. Reductive explanation and the ‘explanatory gap’ A reductive explanation of phenomenal consciousness could be successful by doing the following.

It could explain all that needs explaining at the target level, Bundling these third-person characterizations into a third-person concept of phenomenal consciousness, we can then pick out.

The Core Concept states that consciousness changes in cycles that normally correspond to our biological rhythms and to the patterns of our environment.

Which of the following illustrates this concept? Psychologists needed a better explanation than behaviorism could provide and (2) New technology could scan the brain for better analysis. Mar 30,  · There is no concept of an individual if we are driven by a single consciousness, no mechanism for feedback given that the PC already knows what you are doing and going to do.

In my reasoning I am the driver and I have a passenger who keeps me in check who I feedback to and that helps evolve any future drivers.

The concept of no single great explanation for consciousness
Rated 4/5 based on 68 review